Criticism has been plentiful for Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of Donald Trump, following his recent remarks on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Political commentator Zeeshan Aleem described Kushner’s ideas as “terrible” and “nauseating.”
A Questionable Approach
In a scathing op-ed on MSNBC, Aleem highlighted Kushner’s suggestions during an interview at Harvard University, labeling them as “politically illiterate and offensive.”
Kushner, who held a senior advisory role in the Trump administration, hinted at drastic measures such as the potential ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.
Aleem expressed concern that Kushner’s remarks might serve as a window into the possible strategies of a future Trump-led government in managing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Sensitivity and Controversy
The suggestion made by Kushner about the value of Gaza’s waterfront properties amidst the ongoing conflict drew sharp criticism from Aleem, who deemed it “insensitive.”
Additionally, Aleem pointed out that Kushner’s proposal to relocate people from Gaza to “clean it up” bordered on endorsing ethnic cleansing, a notion he found alarming.
Underlying Concerns
Despite the improbable nature of Kushner’s concepts being put into practice, Aleem highlighted the troubling lack of consideration for Palestinian rights and the apparent alignment with extreme Israeli ideologies in dealing with Gaza.
The fear looms that a potential return of the Trump administration to power could exacerbate an already tense situation, as per Aleem’s warnings.
Repercussions and Criticisms
Kushner has faced backlash for his previous controversial statements, including his recent one on the valuable nature of Gaza’s waterfront property if development were prioritized.
A past remark by Kushner suggesting that American Jews were safer in Saudi Arabia than on U.S. college campuses amidst Israel-Hamas tensions also drew significant ire.
Despite the controversy trailing his words, Kushner’s spouse, Ivanka Trump, attempted to reframe his views as “informative and thought-provoking,” likely as damage control following her father’s critical remarks about Israel at an election rally.