Russ Cohen

ASPI CLASS ACTION NOTICE: Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Files Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against ASP Isotopes Inc.

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”), announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Corredor v. ASP Isotopes Inc., et al., Case No. 24-cv-09253, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired ASP Isotopes Inc. (“ASP Isotopes” or the “Company”) ASPI securities between October 30, 2024 and November 26, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Plaintiff pursues claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Investors are hereby notified that they have 60 days from the date of this notice to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff in this action.

If you suffered a loss on your ASP Isotopes investments or would like to inquire about potentially pursuing claims to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, you can submit your contact information at www.glancylaw.com/cases/ASP-Isotopes-Inc/. You can also contact Charles H. Linehan, of GPM at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, or via email at shareholders@glancylaw.com or visit our website at www.glancylaw.com to learn more about your rights.

On November 26, 2024, Fuzzy Panda Research published a report which alleged that ASP Isotopes is “using old, disregarded laser enrichment technology to masquerade as a new, cutting-edge Uranium enrichment.” The report quoted a former employee of Klydon (the company ASP Isotopes purchased its “proprietary” technology from) as stating scientists “did not think it would work on Uranium.” The report revealed a series of experts interviewed stated the Company’s reported cost estimates and timeline for building its HALEU uranium facilities was misleading to the point of being “delusional.” The report further alleged the Company had significantly overstated the significance of its agreement with TerraPower, which was only a “non-binding” memorandum of understanding entered into to “put pressure on [TerraPower’s] real suppliers.” The report quoted a former TerraPower executives as stating that ASP Isotopes was “missing the manufacturing; They are missing the processes as well; They still have to develop the HALEU…the most important part.” Finally, the report revealed that the Company’s subsidiary, Quantum Leap Energy, which operates its nuclear fuels segment and to which the Company assigned the TerraPower memoranda of understanding, was completely absent from its registered South African address. The report revealed there were “zero signs” of their presence and “security guards and neighboring business about them all told us they had never heard of the companies.”

See also  <!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title>The Impact of Trump's Policies on the Magnificent Seven Stocks</title></head><body><h2>Trump's Potential Impact on the Magnificent Seven Companies</h2><p>In the annals of American history, only one former president has managed to secure reelection after losing the first term - Grover Cleveland in 1892, a solitary figure in this political parable. Fast forward to the present, where former President Donald Trump is in a neck-and-neck race with Vice President Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential throne. Should Trump emerge victorious, his policy decisions could cast a long shadow on the fortunes of the revered "Magnificent Seven" companies that include tech behemoths like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. An intriguing narrative unfolds as investors weigh their options in this high-stakes drama.</p><img alt="Former President Donald Trump." src="https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F793603%2Ftrump-at-podium-image-source-official-white-house-photo-by-shealah-craighead.webp" style="width: 50%;"><p class="caption">Former President Donald Trump. Image source: Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead.</p><h2>Assessing Trump's Proposals and Their Ramifications</h2><p>A trio of Trump's propositions loom large over the future of the Magnificent Seven, with his corporate tax cut scheme taking center stage. If re-elected, Trump vows to slice the federal corporate tax rate from the current 21% to a paltry 15%, a move that could recalibrate the financial landscape for these titans of industry. Tariffs are another cornerstone of his economic blueprint, with up to 20% levies on imports and a spotlight on China evident in his rhetoric. Moreover, Trump's zeal for deregulation, epitomized by a promise to scrap onerous rules at a 10:1 ratio against new regulations, could create seismic shifts, especially around artificial intelligence governance.</p><h2>Forecasting the Corporate Weather for the Magnificent Seven</h2><p>While a reduced tax burden might sound like sweet music to the ears of the Magnificent Seven, a deeper dive reveals a nuanced backdrop. Unveiling the effective tax rates paid by these giants in the last fiscal year paints a revealing picture. Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia all operate below the current 21% threshold, with Tesla even benefiting from a 50% tax boon, making the tax cut impact a mixed bag of fortunes.</p><p>Trump's tariff barrage could rattle the foundations of reliant companies, stirring debates on cost pass-through to consumers and the resultant sales pendulum. Apple's global supply chain stands vulnerable to the tariff storm, though players like Alphabet and Meta, deriving significant revenue from services, might weather the storm better.</p><p>The shadow of deregulation could sway fortunes in the cloudy skies of AI governance. Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Nvidia, and to a lesser extent, Meta and Tesla, stand to gain from relaxed regulations, shaping a turbulent yet potentially rewarding horizon.</p><p>Trump's pointed criticism of Alphabet and Meta, juxtaposed with his favorable stance towards Microsoft and Nvidia, sets the stage for a strategic showdown where winners and losers are yet to emerge from the fog of political warfare.</p><h2>Identifying the Ripest Pick among the Magnificent Seven</h2><p>As the curtain rises on the looming political drama, the quest for the choicest investment amidst the Magnificent Seven intensifies. Microsoft and Nvidia emerge as prime contenders in this investment battleground. While Microsoft could reap the fruits of Trump's tax cuts due to its high tax rate and navigate the tariff headwinds, Nvidia's growth potential offers a tantalizing allure, promising the elixir of prosperity beyond the mirage of political turbulence. In the tumultuous landscape of Trumpian economics, the astute investor's choice between these icons could unfold as a pivotal journey towards prosperity.</p></body></html><html> <head> <title>Investment Insights: Assessing the Timing of Lucrative Opportunities</title> </head> <body> Investment Insights: Assessing the Timing of Lucrative Opportunities

On this news, the Company’s stock price fell $1.80 or 23.53%, to close at $5.85 per share on November 26, 2024, on unusually heavy trading volume. The stock continued to fall on the subsequent trading date, falling $0.83 or 14.19%, to close at $5.02 per share on November 27, 2024, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company overstated the potential effectiveness of its enrichment technology; (2) the Company overstated the development potential of its high assay low-enriched uranium facility; (3) the Company overstated the Company’s nuclear fuels operating segment results; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired ASP Isotopes securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than 60 days from the date of this notice to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff. To be a member of the Class you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the Class. If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Charles Linehan, Esquire, of GPM, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, by email to shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at www.glancylaw.com. If you inquire by email please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

5 Stocks Our Experts Predict Could Double In the Next Year

By submitting your email, you'll also get a free pivot & flow membership. A free daily market overview. You can unsubscribe at any time.